Thursday, August 23, 2007

note the time

It started with a gash, a slashing dumpster lid that relieved me of a dime sized slab on the inside of my right thumb, beneath the joint. A quest for Neosporin ensued, with no satisfaction even yet, though I have strayed so far from my original purpose that the failure means little.

In searching for that tiny tube, which I recall seeing in various places over the past many months during which I had no need for ointment, I started rifling through boxes and corners of my closet long unexplored.

One of the first things uncovered was the stash of Monica-related souvenirs, kept for the sake of future nostalgia, rather than unrequited sentiment. A letter, some notes, a stuffed bear, a notebook, a card, photos, that old Cancun shirt, and other things. I found that ring she gave me, that I always used to wear. I wish I could wear it again, because it fits so well, and is perfect for ripping the lids from beer bottles. I read through a letter and a few notes, glanced at some photos before throwing away random debris that did not need saving (a pink razor she left behind on one of her visits, for example).

The letters and notes read like we were already resigned to our separation. Perhaps we were. They offer an interesting perspective now, almost a year after the original ordeal.

I found bank statements and credit card bills from back in the days when I still had $2000 in the bank and only $300 to pay on the card. What I wouldn’t do to have that again.

I found some papers I wrote back in my first phase of college. I could rewrite them to read better, but some of the analysis is surprisingly astute, and I worry that I can’t come up with stuff like that anymore. One in particular discussed Bellamy’s Looking Backward using the Communist Manifesto and Weber’s The Protestant Work Ethic to discuss the use of religion in Bellamy’s socialist utopia, compared to traditional socialist ideals. I can’t believe I did that much reading for one paper.

I also found some old notebooks. I know there were more. I’m a little worried about where they are, because they’re so very personal, and so very very emo.

A lonely pillar standing tall

Supports the starry sky,

And if that pillar were to fall

Nothing’d keep the heavens high.

A chill wind blasts the single pile,

A shiver threatens doom,

The shake has surely cracked a tile

In Aphrodite’s room.

I obviously had girl trouble. Well, I have the same girl trouble to this day, but at least I’ve gotten laid between then and now. And I stopped writing shitty poetry.

Many of these entries are written as a discussion, one speaker, denoted by a square, is pragmatic and thoughtful, the other, a circle, is emotional and generally distraught. They worked together to solve my shit. I don’t think they managed to actually help.

- Go after a girl

O Which? Megan or Sarah?

- Which do you like better?

O They are two different types of people. I don’t know if I prefer one over the other. What do you think?

- There is less competition for Sarah, as far as I know, but you have to deal with her reluctance. Megan isn’t afraid, but might not want to go out with you, with all the other guys to choose from. Imagine being alone with them and compare

O Sarah is more quiet. I’d talk and laugh with her, but she would be uncomfortable. Megan would expect something. I have no clue what.

- Those expectations might end you.

O I have a feeling I fail either way.

It’s 4am as I type this out. I have already exceeded the acceptable blog length. You can click on anytime you want.

It occurs to me that these little chats were once highly embarrassing. I don’t really care anymore. I also notice that the emotional half uses first person, and the pragmatic half uses third. Apparently, the circle was at the helm at the time.

As I write this, I realize that much of my “girl trouble” stems from my general approach, developed in these rather formative high school years. Notably shy, purposely inconspicuous, I did not interact with many people then. I kept to my circle of friends, safe from judgment and the smirking whispers the pocked across the diseased little ecosystem. Such a defensive posture made meeting people rare, and as I have learned, one must meet girls in order to date them. My attempts at dating involved me creeping out of nowhere, approaching the target with the sole purpose of attempting to start something. This doesn’t work. Neither does approaching as a friend. The key is pretending to be interested in friendship long enough that the target doesn’t freak out and run away, and then pouncing.

I still don’t do this. We’re going on 11 months here.

Its almost time for bed. Closing thoughts? I’d love to say that those girls would regret turning me down, but its really not true. I’m broke, studying in a field that promises little, and frequently delivers. I claim to be a writer, but do not write. I’m not really “into” anything, don’t have any passions or deep interests, and as a result am fairly uninteresting myself. I am careless with honesty and choke on flattery and pretense. I’m socially impulsive, but generally unadventurous.

You know all those things girls are looking for in a guy? I don’t, but I’ll take a guess and say that they’re not on that list up there.

Now, where the FUCK is that Neosporin?

Monday, August 20, 2007

Ego, Hubris

By Seth Borenstein
Associated Press
August 19, 2007

(http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8R4H0Q00&show_article=1)

WASHINGTON - Around the world, a handful of scientists are trying to create life from scratch and they're getting closer.

Experts expect an announcement within three to 10 years from someone in the now little-known field of "wet artificial life."

"It's going to be a big deal and everybody's going to know about it," said Mark Bedau, chief operating officer of ProtoLife of Venice, Italy, one of those in the race. "We're talking about a technology that could change our world in pretty fundamental ways -- in fact, in ways that are impossible to predict."

That first cell of synthetic life -- made from the basic chemicals in DNA -- may not seem like much to non-scientists. For one thing, you'll have to look in a microscope to see it.

"Creating protocells has the potential to shed new light on our place in the universe," Bedau said. "This will remove one of the few fundamental mysteries about creation in the universe and our role."

And several scientists believe man-made life forms will one day offer the potential for solving a variety of problems, from fighting diseases to locking up greenhouse gases to eating toxic waste.

Bedau figures there are three major hurdles to creating synthetic life:

- A container, or membrane, for the cell to keep bad molecules out, allow good ones, and the ability to multiply.

- A genetic system that controls the functions of the cell, enabling it to reproduce and mutate in response to environmental changes.

- A metabolism that extracts raw materials from the environment as food and then changes it into energy.

One of the leaders in the field, Jack Szostak at Harvard Medical School, predicts that within the next six months, scientists will report evidence that the first step -- creating a cell membrane -- is "not a big problem." Scientists are using fatty acids in that effort.

Szostak is also optimistic about the next step -- getting nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA, to form a working genetic system.

His idea is that once the container is made, if scientists add nucleotides in the right proportions, then Darwinian evolution could simply take over.

"We aren't smart enough to design things, we just let evolution do the hard work and then we figure out what happened," Szostak said.

In Gainesville, Fla., Steve Benner, a biological chemist at the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution is attacking that problem by going outside of natural genetics. Normal DNA consists of four bases -- adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine (known as A,C,G,T) -- molecules that spell out the genetic code in pairs. Benner is trying to add eight new bases to the
genetic alphabet.

Bedau said there are legitimate worries about creating life that could "run amok," but there are ways of addressing it, and it will be a very long time before that is a problem.

"When these things are created, they're going to be so weak, it'll be a huge achievement if you can keep them alive for an hour in the lab," he said. "But them getting out and taking over, never in our imagination could this happen."

----------------
Care to wager on that last line?

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Bamboo Tea Garden

Collab between Orlandoo and myself.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Busted

New Online Tool Unmasks Wikipedia Edits
August 15, 2007 2:54 PM EDT
(AP) What edits on Wikipedia have been made by people in congressional offices, the CIA and the Church of Scientology? A new online tool called WikiScanner reveals answers to such questions.

As the Web encyclopedia that anyone can edit, Wikipedia encourages participants to adopt online user names, but it also lets contributors be identified simply by their computers' numeric Internet addresses.

Often that does not provide much of a cloak, such as when PCs in congressional offices were discovered to have been involved in Wikipedia entries trashing political rivals.

Those episodes inspired Virgil Griffith, a computer scientist about to enter grad school at CalTech, to automate the process with WikiScanner. (It's at http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr but intense attention has knocked it out of service many times this week.)

The free Scanner grabs the Internet Protocol addresses used in anonymous Wikipedia edits in the past five years. By combining that with public information about which IP addresses belong to whom, the Scanner reveals Wikipedia changes made from computers assigned to a bevy of organizations, including, um, The Associated Press.

Many of the edits are predictably self-interested: PCs in Scientology officialdom were used to remove criticism in the church's Wikipedia entry. But others hint at procrastinating office workers, such as the tweaks to Wikipedia articles on TV shows being made from CIA computers.

Many examples are being tallied at http://wired.reddit.com/wikidgame - a page run by Wired News, which reported earlier on WikiScanner.

Griffith wrote on his site that he hopes "to create minor public relations disasters for companies and organizations I dislike."

Whatever comes of it, WikiScanner has a fan in Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. "It is fabulous and I strongly support it," Wales told the AP.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Let Me Taste Your Taste

I'm obtaining music. Please make suggestions.

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

So I have a question

How is it that the country tried to impeach Clinton for his perjury concerning his sex scandal...

But our current president, who has pretty much blatantly disregarded laws, responsibilities, and restrictions concerning his office, still sits smiling dumb and pretty in his white house?

How is it that we let these corrupt billionaires take control of our country... OUR country... And how can we expect a respectable government to be run by unrespectable men?

Why do we allow ourselves to be lied to over and over again? Even when we learn that we have been violated by this administration, we do nothing. Even when we learn that justice and freedom have been forsaken, we do not react.

How is it that we have allowed this man to rule us? We are supposed to be a democracy. WE are supposed to make the decisions... And yet, even the beginnings of this regime, the usurpation of power was suspect, with underhanded tactics and scandals quietly ignored by the majority?

We sit quietly. Are we complacent? Do we not care?

Or have we forgotten that it is our responsibility to shout down the overambitious ruler?

Have we fallen to trusting our representatives, who buffer us from the responsibility of true democracy?

Or have we (and I fall in this last category) given up hope of influencing these men who speak for us in the larger houses of the government?

It does not seem like it should matter... Whatever the cause of our silence, the real question is this: How do we find our voice again? How do we speak out and make a difference?

Bush has over 530 days left in office. That's a year and a half-- more than a third of his final term. I don't think he should be trusted with that much time, and that much power. Imagine the damage that could be done. Think of how many more men will die face down in the sand, how many billions of dollars will be thrown away because we let aman who has consistently shown a lack of intelligence, conscience, and responsibility in the management of this country.

Any other man would be in jail... We tried to prosecute Clinton for lying about cheating on his wife. Bush took us to war. WAR, people! Guns and bombs and body parts.

Why the fuck is this country still asleep?

It is time for us to start pushing the senators to bring down Caeser.

*****
Is it bad that I am honestly frightened of retaliation, should I fill out this form?

V for Vendetta is no longer fiction